2.3. Human-Human-Interaction

The usual way humans interact with each other is face-to-face and by language. In such a communication at least two humans exchange meaning verbally. But words and sentences are not the sole part of the communication. Potentially humans can communicate with all five senses: sight, sound, touch, taste and smell. Using these channels, many other cues, verbal and non-verbal, are incorporated when transferring meaning. The sender employs these cues subconsciously and the receiver understands it in the same fashion - subconsciously. A vital feature is that our everyday interaction with each other and the world around us is a multi-sensory one, each sense providing different information that builds up the whole.

Let's have a closer look on human-human communication. A key issue in interaction is language. It is not a one-channel but always a two-channel process. The sender utters some words complemented by gaze, The receiver gives back some kind of acknowledgement to the sender, poses questions or takes turn, i.e. there is feed-back channel (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: The sender-receiver model of human communication

The fluency, prosody and intonation of the sentences and words tell us important things about the speaker, e.g. about his inner state, about the circumstances he is speaking of or to give or emphasise a certain meaning. A closer look on language in dialogs brings up five main human abilities to successfully participate in conversation (CMT3210).

1.      An important aspect of communication is the human's ability to recognise openings and closings of topics during a conversation. It guaranties that both persons keep track on each others contexts to advance the dialog or avoid misunderstandings.

A: Do you want another pint?          opening

B: what's the time?                                opening

A: ten to ten                                          closing

B: OK, yes thanks                          closing

2.      If a misunderstanding should occur, a second 'basic' technique jumps in: repair actions. Using questions or non-verbal cues they try to clarify the questionable fact or the context it is embedded in.

3.      Humans exhibit context sensitivity when interacting with each others. They can understand the meaning of the words in a certain context, be it the actual situation the fact is told or a certain (fictitious) setting, e.g. the last holiday.

4.      To keep the conversation going, humans use short sequences of feed-back cues and turn-taking signals. First show to the speaker that the listener is following the speaker's pace of thoughts, e.g. a nod or mumbling 'Hmmm'. Latter signals to the listener that he might take turn and begin to speak, e.g. a pause and looking into the eyes.

5.      If the communication situation provides more than two people, it can happen that the original speaker hands over 'his' conversation with the second human to a third one, who takes up the talk. This concept incorporates adjacent pairs of action and response.

A: who is speaking?              action

B: it’s Bob Fields                             response

C: is he going to the US?                  action

D: well, I heard that ….                    response

The relationship and interplay between these abilities make it happen that humans understand such concepts like humour, sarcasm and irony. Humans can detect if there is a mismatch between the literal word, it's meaning (semantics) and what the speaker wants to tell (pragmatics). In humour, sarcasm and irony the pure words never transport the true meaning, but intonation, pauses and prosody may hint on the speaker's intention. They listener has to have some background knowledge fitting the speaker's one to decode the message. Otherwise misunderstandings are likely.

Aside from the language centred cues there are multiple sources of sensory information, the so called non-verbal cues. These cues could support or complement the verbal utterances, e.g. pointing somewhere and saying 'there!'. It includes gestures like hand movements, head and eye movements as well as body movement and body orientation. Non-verbal cues can be expressions on their own, i.e. the body language. Turning your back on someone and crossing  the arms in front of your chest will tell anyone that you don't want to interact with this person even if you don't say a word. On the other hand, when someone identifies a known person, the typical reaction is tracking with the eyes and a body orientation towards the person in question. That will be understood as a sign of openness and the disposition to start a conversation. Non-verbal cues play an important role for both, the speaker and the listener. For the speaker they are necessary means to accentuate his story. They support the listener to understand what the speakers wants to tell. Without non-verbal cues the conversation would be 'stiff' and quite unnatural.

An important aspect is the context of the conversation are the emotional states of the participants. They play a key role to truly understand what each one wants to tell. Thus the ability to recognise, interpret and express emotions - commonly referred to as "emotional intelligence" (Goleman, 1995) - plays a key role in human communication. Related is empathy, another typical property of human-human interaction. It means that someone shows understanding of the other's situation and is feeling with the individual, e.g. after a friend has suffered from a great loss one could express his sympathy by simply hugging him. [CG1]  Without showing some kind of empathy the human-human conversation is cold and distant, solely consisting of facts - not any social. This is how we have to interact with computers today. To see how we could bring social factors into this interaction, let us have a closer look on the status quo of Human-Computer Interaction in the next chapter.

 


  [CG1] Both concepts are covered in the Pragmatic Model (PM) of interpersonal communication. PM highlights principles not addressed by any model discussed so far. "The pragmatic model emphasizes the creative and motivational characteristics of human interaction" (Rowley, 1999).

Pragmatic Model: http://maine.edu/~zubrick/tren2.html).

Introduction to the Pragmatic View of Interpersonal Communication. Pages 17-18

An Introduction to Interpersonal Communication as Relationship. Pages 19-37

A Pragmatic Model of Interpersonal Communication. Pages 38-58

Fisher, B.A., & Adams, K.L. (1994). Interpersonal communication: Pragmatics of human relationships. (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.

Adler, R. B.; Rosenfeld, L. B. & Proctor, R. F. (2004). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

Custom Readings Packet (2002). Introduction to Interpersonal Communication: A Relational View of Interpersonal Processes, 2nd edtion. McGraw Hill Publishing.